You Can Now Get Paid To Train LinkedIn’s AI

You May also be interested in

LinkedIn Content Benchmarks 2026: Which Post Format Drives Most Engagement

If you are still guessing which LinkedIn content format to prioritise, new benchmark data from 1.3 million posts makes the answer clear: native document posts (uploaded PDFs displayed as carousels) generate the highest engagement rate of any content type on the platform at 7.00%, followed by multi-image posts at 6.45% and video at 6.00%. This matters because LinkedIn's overall engagement rate has actually increased 8% year-over-year to an average of 5.20%, even as organic reach continues to decline. The platform is rewarding depth and substance over volume, and the formats that keep people on the page longest are winning. This guide breaks down the latest Socialinsider 2026 LinkedIn Benchmarks data, explains what it means for your content strategy, and shows how employee advocacy programmes can use these insights to maximise performance. Document Posts Now Outperform Every Other LinkedIn Format The biggest finding from the Socialinsider study is that native document posts have overtaken all other content types for engagement. As Social Media Today reported, this is a significant departure from other social platforms where short-form video dominates. Here is how each format performed based on average engagement rate by impressions in 2025: Native documents: 7.00% (up 14% year-over-year) Multi-image posts: 6.45% Video: 6.00% (up 7% YoY) Image: 5.30% (up 9% YoY) Text: 4.50% (up 12% YoY) Poll: 4.20% Link: 3.25% The year-over-year trend is notable. Engagement grew across every content format except polls and links. Document posts saw the largest increase at 14%, but even simple text posts climbed 12%. LinkedIn users are engaging more across the board. Julia Holmqvist, Social Media Manager at Semrush, explained the document trend well in the Socialinsider report: documents perform because they deliver downloadable, practical value like frameworks, templates, and checklists in a format that is easy to scan and save for later. This aligns with what LinkedIn's own algorithm now rewards: dwell time. Document carousels require swiping through multiple slides, which keeps users on the post longer than almost any other format. That extended attention signals quality to the algorithm and triggers broader distribution. Multi-Image Posts Drive the Most Likes While documents lead on overall engagement rate, the data shows a different winner for likes specifically: multi-image posts generate the most likes across every page size. For pages with 100K to 1M followers, multi-image posts average 180 likes per post compared to 155 for video and 30 for native documents. The pattern holds for smaller pages too, though at lower absolute numbers. This creates a useful strategic distinction. If your goal is overall engagement (comments, shares, saves, clicks), prioritise documents. If your immediate goal is social proof through visible like counts, multi-image posts are your best option. For employee advocacy content, this distinction matters. Employees sharing document carousels will generate deeper engagement that drives profile visits and conversations. Employees sharing multi-image posts will generate higher visible reaction counts that build credibility in the feed. Both have a place in a well-rounded advocacy programme. Video Views Are Declining Despite More Video Being Posted One of the most counterintuitive findings in the data is that LinkedIn video views dropped 36% year-over-year across all page sizes, even as brands doubled their video posting frequency from 2 to 4 posts per month. The decline is consistent across every audience tier. Pages with 10K to 50K followers saw average video views drop from 1,000 to Even the largest pages (100K to 1M followers) saw views fall from 2,430 to 1,This does not mean video is dead on LinkedIn. Video still generates a 6.00% engagement rate, which is above the platform average. But it does suggest that the market is saturated with video content, and the returns are diminishing as more brands compete for attention in the same format. The Socialinsider report includes a useful insight from Semrush's social team: LinkedIn is not a video-first platform the way TikTok or Instagram are. Users do not open LinkedIn to scroll through video feeds. They come for professional knowledge sharing, and the formats built for that purpose (documents, text, images) are outperforming video on the metrics that matter. For employee advocacy, this reinforces the case for document carousels and well-crafted text posts over video. Most employees are more comfortable creating a PDF or writing a text post than recording and editing video, and the data shows those formats perform just as well or better. Impressions Vary Dramatically by Page Size and Format The benchmark data reveals how much content performance depends on audience size. The right format for a page with 5,000 followers is not the same as the right format for a page with 100,For pages with under 50K followers, multi-image posts consistently generate the most impressions per post. A page with 10K to 50K followers averages 1,850 impressions per multi-image post compared to 1,420 for video and 1,150 for native documents. For pages with over 50K followers, polls become the highest-impression format. Pages with 100K to 1M followers average 9,797 impressions per poll compared to 3,867 for multi-image posts. This is a significant finding for employee advocacy. Most employee LinkedIn profiles have follower counts in the low thousands, which means the multi-image and document formats are their best options for maximising both reach and engagement. Polls may work well for executive profiles with larger followings but are less effective for the broader employee base. Posting Frequency Is Increasing Across Visual Formats Brands are posting more on LinkedIn, particularly in visual formats. Image posts increased from an average of 5 to 7 per month. Video doubled from 2 to 4 per month. Native document posts rose from 1 to 2 per month. This increase in posting frequency aligns with Buffer's finding that top-performing LinkedIn accounts post more frequently and more consistently than the median account. The "no-post penalty" is real: accounts that skip a week consistently underperform their own baseline growth rate. For employee advocacy programmes, the practical takeaway is straightforward. Encourage employees to post at least 2 to 3 times per week. Provide them with a mix of content formats, particularly documents and multi-image posts. And make the content creation process as frictionless as possible so consistency does not feel like a burden. Our employee advocacy training guide covers how to build posting habits that sustain momentum without burning employees out. Audience Growth Is Slowing, Especially for Large Pages LinkedIn follower growth rates declined across every page size in Pages with 1K to 5K followers still saw a respectable 24.5% average growth rate, but pages with 100K to 1M followers saw growth slow sharply to just 6.4%, down from 21.6% the previous year. This slowdown has a direct strategic implication: growing an audience through your company page alone is increasingly difficult. The brands that maintain healthy growth rates are those that supplement company page content with employee-driven distribution. Our analysis of 400 million LinkedIn impressions found that employee posts generate 14 times more engagement than company page content. When audience growth on your company page stalls, activating employee voices is the most effective lever available. Employee networks are roughly 12 times larger than company follower bases, and the LinkedIn algorithm allocates approximately 65% of feed real estate to personal profiles versus just 5% for company pages. What This Means for Your LinkedIn Strategy in 2026 The Socialinsider data points to a clear set of priorities for marketing teams. Lead with documents and carousels. They generate the highest engagement rate and align with what LinkedIn's algorithm rewards: dwell time and substantive content. Invest in creating original frameworks, research summaries, checklists, and guides in PDF format. Use multi-image posts for visibility and social proof. When you need likes and impressions rather than deep engagement, multi-image posts are consistently the top performer across page sizes under 50K followers. Be strategic with video. Video still works on LinkedIn, but the declining returns mean it should complement your strategy rather than dominate it. Use video for content that genuinely benefits from the format, like executive interviews, behind-the-scenes footage, or product demonstrations, rather than defaulting to video for everything. Post consistently. Frequency matters. The data shows brands are increasing output across visual formats, and top performers post more often and more consistently than average accounts. Aim for at least 2 to 3 posts per week per employee in your advocacy programme. Invest in employee advocacy. With company page growth slowing and the algorithm favouring personal profiles, employee-driven content is the highest-leverage organic strategy available. Equip your team with document templates, multi-image assets, and clear guidelines. For practical guidance on getting started, see our employee advocacy buyer's guide. Personalise everything. The algorithm penalises mass-identical resharing. When employees share content from your advocacy programme, even a single line of personal commentary transforms a templated share into authentic content that performs dramatically better. Frequently Asked Questions What is the best content format on LinkedIn in 2026? Native document posts (uploaded PDFs displayed as carousels) generate the highest average engagement rate at 7.00%, according to Socialinsider's analysis of 1.3 million LinkedIn posts. Multi-image posts follow at 6.45%, and video at 6.00%. What is a good engagement rate on LinkedIn? LinkedIn's overall average engagement rate by impressions is 5.20% in Content above this threshold is performing better than typical. Native documents average 7.00%, making them the format most likely to exceed the benchmark. Are LinkedIn video views declining? Yes. Average video views dropped 36% year-over-year across all page sizes, even as brands doubled their video posting frequency. Video still generates above-average engagement rates, but the returns are diminishing as more content competes in the format. How often should a company post on LinkedIn? Benchmark data shows brands are increasing their posting frequency, particularly for images (7 per month) and video (4 per month). Top-performing accounts post more frequently and consistently than the median. For employee advocacy, aim for 2 to 3 posts per week per advocate. Why is LinkedIn audience growth slowing? Follower growth rates declined across all page sizes in Pages with 100Kfollowers saw the sharpest slowdown, from 21.6% to 6.4% average growth. The brands maintaining growth are those supplementing company page content with employee-driven distribution through advocacy programmes. Do document posts work for employee advocacy? Yes. Documents are an ideal format for employee advocacy because they showcase expertise through practical resources like frameworks, checklists, and research summaries. They generate the highest engagement rate on the platform and align with what LinkedIn's algorithm rewards: dwell time and substantive content. Ready to equip your team with the content formats that actually work on LinkedIn? Vulse helps marketing teams create, distribute, and measure employee content that drives real engagement. Start your free trial or book a demo to see how it works.

Learn More

Loading



LinkedIn Now Lets You Filter Comments by Verified Members

LinkedIn has quietly rolled out a new comment sorting option that lets users filter replies by verified members only. It is a small interface change with significant implications for anyone using LinkedIn as a B2B content and engagement channel. Here is what the update involves and what it means for brands running employee advocacy programmes. What LinkedIn Has Changed LinkedIn has added a third sort option to post comments alongside the existing Most Relevant and Most Recent filters. The new option is called Verified Members, and selecting it shows only comments from users who have confirmed their identity on the platform. According to LinkedIn's own Help Centre documentation, the feature is designed to help members find authentic comments on posts with large comment volumes. The Verified Members filter surfaces insights from trusted professionals while reducing noise from automated, generic, or inauthentic comments. The feature is currently rolling out to a portion of users rather than the full platform, so you may not see it in your account yet. How LinkedIn Verification Works Unlike verification on Meta or X, LinkedIn verification is free. Members can confirm their identity through third-party support partners or by submitting government ID information directly. LinkedIn reported in December 2024 that more than 100 million members had verified their identity on the platform. Given that LinkedIn has over one billion members in total, verified accounts still represent roughly 10 percent of the user base, which is why the filter is a meaningful signal rather than a universal one. Why LinkedIn Is Prioritising Verified Content The timing of this update is not accidental. LinkedIn content has become a leading source for AI-generated answers, with research showing LinkedIn is among the most cited platforms by AI chatbots when generating professional and business-related responses. That citation value depends entirely on the quality and authenticity of the content being cited. If bot-generated or spam comments dilute the signal, LinkedIn's value as a trusted professional data source weakens. Surfacing verified member content is one way to protect the integrity of that data stream. There is also a straightforward commercial incentive: the more LinkedIn can demonstrate that its platform hosts authentic, high-quality professional conversations, the stronger its case for Premium subscriptions, advertising investment, and enterprise product sales. What This Means for Employee Advocacy Teams For B2B brands running employee advocacy programmes, this update has three direct implications. Verified employees carry more weight in comments. If your employees are engaging with prospects' posts, commenting on industry conversations, or responding to your own company content, a verified profile now places them in the priority tier when others filter by verification. An unverified employee advocate may not appear at all in filtered views. Verification is now a baseline, not a bonus. Until now, LinkedIn verification was something advocates could optionally pursue. This update shifts it closer to a minimum standard for anyone whose LinkedIn engagement is part of a broader business development or thought leadership strategy. Comment engagement on company posts becomes more valuable. Posts that attract verified member comments will produce higher-quality filtered feeds. Encouraging senior leaders, subject matter experts, and verified employees to comment on company content is now a deliberate reach and trust strategy, not just a vanity metric. What Advocacy Teams Should Do Now Audit your advocate pool for verification status. Identify which of your active employee advocates have completed LinkedIn's identity verification. For any unverified advocates, share LinkedIn's verification instructions and make verification part of your programme onboarding checklist. Update your advocacy programme guidelines. If you maintain a content kit, employee playbook, or onboarding document for your advocacy programme, add LinkedIn verification as a recommended first step. It takes minutes and the benefit compounds over time as the filter becomes more widely used. Prioritise comment engagement, not just post sharing. Employee advocacy programmes typically focus on sharing content from a library. This update is a prompt to also encourage employees to comment thoughtfully on relevant posts in their feed, particularly high-volume posts in your industry where a verified comment in the filtered view gives disproportionate visibility. Track verified engagement separately. If you are measuring your advocacy programme's impact, start segmenting engagement data by whether the interacting accounts are verified. This will become a more meaningful quality signal as LinkedIn continues to weight verified activity in its surfacing decisions. The Bigger Picture This update sits alongside a series of moves LinkedIn has made in 2026 to improve content quality and deepen the value of its professional data layer. Recent changes include expanded AI-powered conversational search, Crosscheck for comparing AI model outputs, and a leadership transition focused on AI development. The direction is consistent: LinkedIn is investing heavily in the credibility and quality of its professional content ecosystem. For brands whose growth depends on organic LinkedIn reach, that investment is only worth capturing if the humans representing your company in the feed are verified, active, and producing content that stands up to scrutiny. Employee advocacy built on authentic, verified professional voices is not just a nice-to-have in that environment. It is increasingly the baseline for visibility. Frequently Asked Questions What is LinkedIn's verified replies filter? It is a new comment sorting option that lets users view only comments from verified members. It sits alongside the existing Most Relevant and Most Recent filters and is designed to reduce spam and bot-generated comments in high-volume post discussions. Is LinkedIn verification free? Yes. Unlike Meta or X, LinkedIn verification does not require a paid subscription. Members can verify their identity through LinkedIn's third-party support partners or by submitting government ID information. Full instructions are available in LinkedIn's Help Centre. How many LinkedIn members are verified? As of December 2024, LinkedIn reported that more than 100 million members had verified their identity on the platform. LinkedIn has over one billion members in total, meaning verified accounts represent approximately 10 percent of the full user base. Does LinkedIn verification improve post reach? Not directly in terms of algorithmic distribution. However, verified member comments are now prioritised in the new filter view, which means verified advocates are more likely to be seen when users sort comments by verification status on high-volume posts. Should employee advocates get verified on LinkedIn? Yes. With LinkedIn now surfacing verified member comments in a dedicated filter, unverified advocates risk being invisible in filtered comment views. Verification should be treated as a standard onboarding step for any employee participating in a formal advocacy programme. What is the difference between LinkedIn verification and LinkedIn Premium? LinkedIn verification confirms a member's real-world identity and is free. LinkedIn Premium is a paid subscription tier that unlocks additional features including InMail credits, profile insights, and learning tools. The two are independent of each other: a member can be verified without Premium and vice versa. Will this filter affect how company page posts perform? Indirectly. Posts that attract substantial verified member engagement will produce richer, higher-quality filtered comment feeds, which may encourage more users to engage with that content. Brands that actively encourage verified employees to comment on company posts are likely to benefit as the filter becomes more widely adopted.

Learn More

Loading



Best LinkedIn Tools for B2B Marketing: A Complete Guide by Category

Quick answer: The best LinkedIn tools in 2026 are not one product but a small stack chosen by job: analytics and measurement to prove what works, AI content creation to publish consistently in an authentic voice, employee advocacy to extend reach through your people, and scheduling to keep it all running. The right combination depends on whether your priority is reach, content quality, or proving return. This guide breaks the market down by category so you can pick the right tool for each job rather than forcing one platform to do everything. TL;DR LinkedIn is the dominant B2B channel: according to LinkedIn, it drives around 80% of all B2B leads that come from social media, and four out of five members influence business decisions at their organisation. The advantage sits with individuals, not brand pages. Personal profiles consistently out-engage company pages by a wide margin (commonly cited at around 8x), yet only a small fraction of members post regularly, so consistent posters have an outsized visibility advantage. No single tool does everything well. The strongest setups combine categories: analytics, AI content creation, advocacy, scheduling and engagement. For measurement, the key 2026 shift is profile-level analytics via LinkedIn's official API, after a wave of scraping-based tools lost access. For content, the 2026 differentiator is AI that writes in each person's individual voice rather than producing templated corporate copy. Why the right LinkedIn tools matter more in 2026 LinkedIn has finished its move from a professional network to the operating system of B2B marketing. According to LinkedIn's own data, the platform generates roughly 80% of all B2B social media leads, and four out of five members drive business decisions where they work. That is an audience of buyers, not just contacts. But reach on LinkedIn has shifted decisively toward people. Personal profiles out-engage company pages by a large margin, and LinkedIn has reported that companies posting consistently each week see roughly double the engagement of those that post sporadically. At the same time, only a small percentage of members post regularly, which means the few who show up consistently capture disproportionate visibility. The implication for tooling is clear. The job is no longer "manage the company page." It is to help real people post consistently, in their own voice, and to measure what that activity actually produces. That is why the LinkedIn tool market has split into distinct categories, each solving a different part of that problem. How to choose a LinkedIn tool Before comparing products, decide which job you are solving. Most teams need two or three of these categories, not all of them: Analytics and measurement to see what is working and prove return AI content creation to publish consistently without it feeling corporate Employee advocacy to extend reach through your team's networks Scheduling and publishing to stay consistent without manual effort Engagement and social selling to turn visibility into conversations Native LinkedIn tools that the platform provides directly The sections below cover each category, what to look for, and the tools worth knowing. We will expand the named picks in each category over time. LinkedIn analytics and measurement tools This is the category that determines whether everything else is working. Most LinkedIn tools report at the company-page level, which hides the data that actually matters: how each individual's content performs, and what that activity returns. What to look for: profile-level reporting (reach and engagement per person, ideally including in-network versus out-of-network reach), and crucially, data pulled through LinkedIn's official API rather than browser-extension scraping. This matters more in 2026 than it used to, because a wave of scraping-based analytics tools lost access as LinkedIn enforced its anti-scraping policies. Official-API tools kept working; the workarounds broke. Featured: Vulse Vulse is a LinkedIn-native advocacy and analytics platform built around individual, profile-level measurement using LinkedIn's official API. Rather than aggregate company-page numbers, it shows reach and engagement per person, so B2B teams can see who is actually driving results and prove return at the individual level. It also includes AI tone-of-voice post drafting, scheduling and a participation leaderboard, but the differentiator is the analytics layer and the compliant, official-API data behind it. Best for: B2B teams, roughly 25 to 200 people, that want to prove advocacy and content are working at the individual level, and that prioritise compliant data over scraping-based tools. You can read more on LinkedIn analytics and how to measure advocacy ROI. AI content creation tools The single biggest barrier to LinkedIn success is consistency, and the biggest barrier to consistency is the blank page. AI content tools solve this, but the 2026 differentiator is whether the AI produces something that sounds like the individual or something that reads like corporate filler. What to look for: AI that learns each person's voice and writing style, so the output feels authentic rather than templated. Generic content shared identically across many profiles looks like spam and performs like it. Featured: Bloomberry Bloomberry is an AI-native platform that generates original LinkedIn posts in each employee's individual voice. Rather than handing employees brand content to reshare, an employee provides an idea or talking point and Bloomberry produces a post that sounds like that specific person. It is best suited to LinkedIn and X, and is a strong fit for teams whose priority is original, authentic employee content rather than distributing approved brand posts. Best for: teams that want their people posting genuine, voice-matched content consistently, not just resharing company posts. Note that Vulse also includes AI tone-of-voice drafting as part of its platform, so there is overlap here. The distinction is emphasis: Bloomberry centres entirely on AI-generated original posts, while Vulse pairs lighter AI drafting with its analytics and official-API measurement focus. Teams that want both content generation and deep measurement often look at how the two categories fit together. Employee advocacy platforms Employee advocacy tools help organisations get their people sharing company content on their own profiles, extending reach far beyond the brand page. This is a large category in its own right, with platforms ranging from legacy enterprise distribution tools to newer, more individual-voice approaches. Because the choice here is nuanced, we cover it in depth separately. See our dedicated guide to the best employee advocacy tools for a full comparison of the platforms, their pricing, and their trade-offs. The short version: the older platforms are built around distributing approved brand content for employees to reshare, while the 2026 direction is toward original, voice-matched employee posts and individual-level measurement of what that activity returns. Scheduling and publishing tools Consistency is the strongest predictor of LinkedIn growth, and scheduling tools remove the friction that breaks consistency. These let you draft, queue and publish posts at optimal times rather than posting manually and inevitably falling off. What to look for: reliable native LinkedIn publishing (not workarounds that risk reach), optimal-time recommendations, and a content calendar that a team can plan against. Many of the analytics and AI tools above include scheduling, so a standalone scheduler is often unnecessary if your chosen platform already covers it. Featured: Supergrow Supergrow is a LinkedIn-first platform that pairs content creation with scheduling. Beyond queuing posts, it gives teams a content board for drafts, approvals and scheduled publishing, plus voice-to-post and AI-guided drafting so employees can keep a consistent cadence without writing from scratch. It is LinkedIn-only by design, so teams wanting multi-platform scheduling will need a broader tool, but for a LinkedIn-native content and scheduling workflow it is a strong fit. Best for: teams that want LinkedIn scheduling tied to content creation, rather than a general multi-platform scheduler. Engagement and social selling tools Visibility without engagement is a billboard. Engagement tools focus on what happens after content is posted: the strategic commenting, profile visits and conversations that turn impressions into pipeline. This category overlaps with social selling, where individual reps use LinkedIn to build relationships and surface opportunities. What to look for: compliant engagement methods that LinkedIn rewards rather than penalises, and clear tracking from engagement activity through to inbound interest. Approaches that automate aggressive outreach carry account-risk, so weigh compliance carefully. We will add named picks to this category over time. Design and visual content tools LinkedIn rewards native visual content: carousels (document posts) and clean graphics consistently outperform plain text for many teams. Canva is the most widely used tool here, with LinkedIn-sized templates for carousels, single images and banners, so non-designers can produce on-brand visuals quickly. For written polish, Grammarly helps keep posts clear and error-free before they publish. Neither replaces an advocacy or analytics platform; they sit alongside one and improve the quality of what your team puts out. Native LinkedIn tools Before buying third-party software, know what LinkedIn provides directly. LinkedIn Marketing Solutions includes the platform's own analytics, Lead Gen Forms (which pre-fill professional data and convert well above typical landing pages), and Sales Navigator for prospecting. Native LinkedIn analytics are limited at the individual level, which is precisely the gap that profile-level tools like Vulse exist to fill, but for company-page reporting and advertising, the native tools are the baseline. Quick comparison Vulse Category: Analytics and advocacy Best for: Proving results at the individual level Key strength: Profile-level analytics via LinkedIn's official API Starting price: From £17/mo Bloomberry Category: AI content creation Best for: Original, voice-matched employee posts Key strength: AI that writes in each person's voice Starting price: Free plan; Pro from $49/mo Supergrow Category: Content creation and scheduling Best for: A LinkedIn-first content and scheduling workflow Key strength: Voice-to-post, content board and scheduling Starting price: From $19/mo LinkedIn native tools Category: Platform tools Best for: Company-page reporting, ads, prospecting Key strength: Built in, no extra vendor Starting price: Included, or ad spend This comparison will expand as we add tools to each category. How to build your LinkedIn tool stack You rarely need one tool. A practical 2026 stack looks like this: Foundation: native LinkedIn analytics and Lead Gen Forms for the company page and any advertising. Content: an AI content tool so your people publish consistently in their own voice. Reach: an advocacy approach that activates employees beyond the brand page. Proof: a profile-level analytics layer so you can see who is driving results and justify the investment. The two pieces teams most often underbuild are authentic content creation and individual-level measurement. Get those two right and the rest tends to follow, because consistent, authentic posting is what the platform rewards, and clear measurement is what keeps the programme funded. Frequently asked questions What are the best LinkedIn tools for B2B in 2026? There is no single best tool, because the category covers different jobs. The strongest stacks combine analytics and measurement, AI content creation, employee advocacy and scheduling. Choose by the job you are solving rather than looking for one platform to do everything. What is the most important LinkedIn tool category? For most B2B teams, the two highest-leverage categories are AI content creation (to publish consistently and authentically) and profile-level analytics (to prove what works). These are also the two categories teams most commonly underbuild. Why does official LinkedIn API access matter for analytics tools? Because tools built on browser-extension scraping became fragile and lost access as LinkedIn enforced its anti-scraping policies. Tools using LinkedIn's official API, such as Vulse, kept working and offer compliant, stable data. It is now a genuine buying criterion. Do I need separate tools or one platform? Most teams use two or three tools across categories. Some platforms bundle several jobs (Vulse pairs analytics with AI drafting and scheduling, for example), which can reduce the number of vendors. Map your needs to categories first, then look for overlap. Are LinkedIn's native tools enough on their own? For company-page reporting, advertising and prospecting, the native tools are a solid baseline. But native analytics are limited at the individual level, which is where third-party profile-level tools add the most value for B2B teams focused on employee-driven reach. Prove what your LinkedIn activity is actually doing The two things most LinkedIn programmes underbuild are authentic content and individual-level measurement. Vulse covers the measurement gap with profile-level analytics built on LinkedIn's official API, so you can see reach and engagement per person and prove return rather than guessing from company-page numbers. Start there, and build the rest of your stack on evidence.

Learn More

Loading